.
.
.
Science is most misconstrued or misused with such attitude. A useful tool within ones belt, a wealth of uses we've all felt, but dote upon its cloying ways: too soon we are as drones and slaves to wallow in its easy vices, suspect fixes—"new" devices..
Science is then too respected; "inadequacies" have been protected... Who sprints before they learn to walk; who mumbles where we must have talk? "Scientistics" snaps proud fingers, still, less than subtle fear must linger... we could lose what we have gained if what propels us proves our shame!
.
Smirking laughter fills the halls at "feeding troughs" where *science* lolls in languid lunches with "dyskeptics"... thinking's somewhat less eclectic. Focused on their *bigger* picture, call it their "investment's" stricture, they must toe the *party* line or lose their funding—jobs—one finds.
.
Well... ...screw those bastards! They're devolved! They abdicate their honor! Solved! These pretend that they're equipped to take a step I feel they'll miss... ...so make us leap a needless hurdle, hobbling more sincere proposals!
.
...Consider Tesla, what a find—a "Moses" for Electric-kind! They sure sensed where HE was headed, "dried him up"... ...then HEAPED discredit! ...And this despite the grandest gift as one could think of... imagine it! ...Power snatched from thinnest air; we could be as gods, mon frère!
.
See? Being right's no guarantee. We shall not HAVE what sets us free! ...Velikovsky's explanation, good support and gave citation—he wrote a book so roundly panned it begs another look, by damn!
.
Sitchin makes the ancients real and what they wrote's the real deal! They had knowledge—far exceeding—what's copped to in our schools, I'm reading.
.
Why, consider temples strongly made, but ruined in *disasters*—razed! First? Built to face a rising Sol... ...upon its solstice one is told... a line configured for encryptions, strange conjunctions, and eclipses! They knew their seasons—knew a year—divided by their days of fear!
.
A number of "the circle" WAS ... nine times forty—works it does! All the numbers (apart from seven) turn three sixty 'round the heavens! They weren't stupid, knew their stuff—why: to make damned sure they'd food enough!
.
Here's the point, and listen closely, the temples are rebuilt—some mostly. Still not stupid, they display that temple turned... degrees away!
.
The sun has moved (?), and turned right back (!); as if come up in some other track! The Sun's inconstant; is that true? How's that get passed a peer review?
.
Temples moved to follow suns in shifting solar dances FROM... locations they had held for years—though when Suns moved... it kindled fear!
.
Kingdoms were reduced in thunder... populations quaked at wonders... Earth and Mars indeed contrived... to meet in space and coincide!
.
Folks would think they'd seared their souls! Despite their sacrifice, God scolds! God "moved," in turn, "the sun around," e'en "stopped it dead" as one had found! The reader knows the sun's unmoved; the supposition's Earth was moved...
.
Science's shocked, and then dismisses... sundials that don't work... as *misses*—errors that our elders made, in ignorance that they'd put paid. A year, in days, three sixty-five (a quarter, change, to keep it right?). That's the way it's "always been" (!), and any more's a "drooling grin"?
.
Science smirks so glowingly, like they've the answers, knowingly—like we can TRUST those "at the trough" to tell us when "enough's enough":
.
"Scientists are... just not Science" these intone their self-reliance. "Science is a path we use to keeps the facts for firm review. Thesis and antithesis—we test these out for synthesis."
.
That becomes a brand new "posit" searching for its opposite. This is found and onward bound—repeated, scored , and checked... found "sound." Continued to some far refrain, we'd hope some meager TRUTH remains!
.
You think that I confuse these two? You think it's me who misconstrues? But no, good friend—and just BECAUSE it's science IS as science DOES, that we will stay down on our knees, to hide the skies, and NOT be free!
.
You just mouth an old refrain—a cloak you wear to hide the stain. These are just mere words to you—to stonewall's what you really do!
.
You can't search the scary skies without assumptions you contrived to keep on feeding at a trough that keeps you down and clueless—lost. You can't mean your snide derision, blame it on the imposition of our leaders un-elected who remain so... undetected.
.
Who is hidden? Who betrays? What grand secret haunts our days?
.
What will all our futures bring? Gracious bounty? ...Or, slaps and stings?
.
alienview@roadrunner.com
www.AlienView.net
One Brian Zeiler writes;
So, once again, we see the basic pseudoscientific line of argumentation of the "skeptics": instead of addressing the claims with the specificity demanded of the scientific method and the protocols of logical debate, Posner chooses to assert that his opponents suffer from a pathological medical condition, a bold claim for which Posner apparently has no burden of proof. Posner, a self-styled "skeptic" forgets that in science, criticisms of claims must be specific, not vague attacks—much less vague attacks on mental stability.
Posner, like most "skeptics", will cloak the shocking irrationality of his amazingly pseudoscientific claim in the holy robes of "science," thus lending a false sense of scientific legitimacy to an approach more consistent with witch hunts and crowd madness than with the scientific methodology which he ironically claims to defend. In reality, he only denigrates that which he purports to promote.
Thank you, Posner, for illustrating the essence of "skepticism" in a way that is highly effective in discrediting any sense of objectivity and scientific rationality that you might have hoped to enjoy. Of course, your fellow skeptic cult members will simply laugh and congratulate you, but that's only to be expected.
How did the scientific community morally deteriorate to such a level where base instinct overrides the logical faculties? Posner's comments are the antithesis of scientific methodology and logical debate, yet CSI[COP] promotes such intolerable, fanatical viewpoints nevertheless, all while cloaking their zealous agenda of dogmatic fascism in the ruse of objective science.
—Brian Zeiler
.,¸¸,.»§«,¸¸,.·´¯`·.,¸¸,.»§«***»§«,¸¸,.·´¯`·.,¸¸,.»§«·.,¸¸,.
Not all THAT overstated, eh? …And so it goes as one wonders what a scientist really is. Just another "Priest"...or gravid psychopath not personally responsible for aggregate acts, consequences, and activities? Do I repeat myself, I wonder.
No comments:
Post a Comment