Justification

Critical Prose & Poetic Commentary regarding UFOs and their astonishing ancillaries, consciousness & conspiracy, plus a PROUD sufferer of orthorexia nervosa since 2005!

Monday, June 15, 2026

An "Owl," a Meteor, and a "Coward’s" Media

 

Donald Keyhoe

An "Owl," a "Meteor," and a "Coward’s" Media...

by Alfred Lehmberg


[Frank Feschino, Jr. examines Donald Keyhoe's penetrating Flatwoods Investigation in Keyhoe’s 1953 book, "FLYING SAUCERS from Outer Space."]


Mr. Donald Keyhoe was a retired Marine Corps naval aviator and World War II veteran, as has been noted before. Then he was an aviation writer, the tour manager for Charles Lindbergh's 1927 American tour to promote civil aviation, plus he became well-known in many aviation circles in Washington, D.C. and around the world. He was very much celebrated!

This is pointed out because the New York Times portrayed him at the time more like a credulous loon as regards UFOs, a confabulator, and even a liar... instead of the reasoning and sober researcher that he proved to be! The article in question…

.,¸¸,.»§«,¸¸,.·´¯`·.,¸¸,.»§^§«,¸¸,.·´¯`·.,¸¸,.»§«·.,¸¸,.

·        The New York Times, November 22, 1953. Section BR, Page 50.

·         Flying Sky-High; FLYING SAUCERS FROM OUTER SPACE.  By Maj. Donald E. Keyhoe. 276 pp.  New York: Henry Holt & Co. $3.

·         BELIEVERS in flying saucers—the ones convinced that they are space ships from another planet—have developed an almost impregnable pattern of protective dialectic. Its basic dogma is that the United States Air Force is run by fools or traitors. Once this "fact" is accepted, the rest is easy. The story goes like this. The Air Force, whose duty is to protect the nation from airborne unpleasantness, has evaluated thousands of saucer "sightings" and has come to the conclusion that many of the saucers are "U. F. O.'s" (Unidentified Flying Objects) which behave in such peculiar ways that they can be nothing but extraterritorial space ships. For some reason, however, the Air Force has decided to keep this situation from the public. It conceals the evidence and tries to explain the U. F. O.'s as man-made objects, natural phenomena, hallucinations or hoaxes. Apparently, all foreign air forces have joined the conspiracy of silence. Only a few persistent investigators, such as Maj. Donald E. Keyhoe (of Marines, retired), author of "Flying Saucers From Outer Space," have the guts to buck this system. They haunt the Pentagon to pore over saucer reports that an Air Force underground allows them to inspect. Then they write books or articles that tell all. Major Keyhoe's tell-all book is full of long, unrememberable conversations. It teems with unidentified authorities and anonymous sources. It describes startling photographs, but prints none of them. It contains abundant evidence that the major is no expert in the field of physics.

·         Mr. Leonard, a science editor and writer, is the author of “Flight Into Space."

·         In many cases, for instance, he accepts without comment sensational estimates of a saucer's speed. The fact is, of course, that no one can judge the distance of an unfamiliar flying object unless he knows its size. Without knowing its distance he cannot judge its speed. This is particularly true of lights, but Major Keyhoe tells of many lights that were speeding through the dark sky at thousands of miles per hour. The major's chief contact with the pro-saucer faction seems to have been one Albert M. Chop, whom he describes as "the Air Force civilian expert on unidentified flying objects." Chop, in reality, was a minor functionary at the Air Force press desk. He says nothing startling, but the major tries to give the impression that Chop knows the great secret (that the saucers are space ships) and is bursting to tell it.

·          On the book's jacket the major's publishers print a polite letter that they got from Chop last January. It is noncommittal, but if read hastily it might seem to endorse "the interplanetary answer." Chop resigned his Air Force job about the time he wrote the letter. Up to the present writing, the Air Force has taken the attitude that most of the saucer "sightings" can be explained in unsensational ways. Most of the remainder, the U. F. O.'s, are hoaxes or reports too vague to be evaluated. Quite properly, however, the Air Force has not ruled out space ships absolutely. Since it cannot be proved that the Earth is the only inhabited place in the universe, there remains a tenuous possibility that spaceships may be visiting the Earth. On this extreme improbability are built such books as Major Keyhoe's.

.,¸¸,.»§«,¸¸,.·´¯`·.,¸¸,.»§^§«,¸¸,.·´¯`·.,¸¸,.»§«·.,¸¸,.

The article’s dismissive cant and suspicious bias are all too clear. We can, and with prejudice, couch this thankless review of Donald Keyhoe’s journalistic prowess, his honor, and his intelligence regarding the twitchy subject of UFOs and their always attendant highly strange... a highly strange that everyone is ordinarily loath to talk about... except to dismiss! In light of what had occurred ufologically since (...and then was blithely unremembered by The Times!) in 1947, 1952s "Summer of Saucers"... then on the many, many UFO flaps since… but finally with what is currently happening in Congress about UFOs as this piece is written in June of 2026; UFOs don't go away! Keyhoe helped alert us to this!

No, a test of unblinking time shows that Donald Keyhoe was spot on and credible all the damned time! He was not credulous! He was not a disingenuous loon as the Times intimated! He was NOT a liar as the Times all but charged! 

The Grey Lady has always needed a sick sack for the highly unusual and journalistically indigestible! ...The word "coward" is used in the title of this piece! Onward!

Despite this unflatteringly disingenuous, wholly unfounded, and suspiciously motivated Times "review," (sneer quotes) and as a result of Keyhoe's groundbreaking “flying saucer” research (plus his writings in the late 1940's and 50's), he would become a prominent and named researcher of same! Be assured, reader, he was well respected as regards the soberly approached subject of UFOs. Moving on.

A pioneer aviator of some renown himself, Mr. Keyhoe also knew many USAF officials involved with UFO investigative wing at Project Blue Book! He often corresponded with them, including PBB Chief Captain Edward Ruppelt, the fellow famed for writing authoritatively about “lurid duels of DEATH” with UFOs... and the fallaciously minimized-by-the-Times-article, USAF public spokesman Albert Chop. Keyhoe's 1953 book explains, "He [Chop] has worked closely with the U.S. Air Force agency investigating the saucers, Project Blue Book." This is not disputed or otherwise disparaged in any way. Chop WAS the Air Force's UFO publicity guy!

Air War... what would the self-honest call it?

We’ll refresh the reader. As lights come up... we find the "Flatwoods Monster" close encounter occurred on September 12, 1952! It involved a damaged UFO, resulting from... one girds one's loins... an air war with flying saucers during that period (The Summer of Saucers!), and its huge alien occupant! In obvious distress and shortly after flying over Flatwoods, West Virginia, the object crash-landed, if silently (strangely!), on the hilltop of Flatwoods’ Fisher farm!  A 12-foot-tall armor-clad being exited its craft, and then, by report, encountered a group of local townspeople! …End of scene.

According to Feschino, when Mr. Donald Keyhoe investigated the Flatwoods incident and wrote about it in "FLYING SAUCERS from Outer Space," he referred to the story as the "Sutton story." He also referred to the so-called "monster" as the "Sutton Monster." In 1952, one finds, Flatwoods was a small town of 300 people and did not even appear on most maps! Mr. Keyhoe therefore referenced the nearby town of "Sutton," which was the recognizable County Seat of Braxton County where the incident occured.

As the story unfolds, Keyhoe writes, "I found myself faced with another puzzle—the case of the 'Sutton Monster.'" He adds, "…Of all the eerie saucer stories, this was the weirdest... The action took place near Sutton, West Virginia, on the night of September 12, 1952." Mr. Keyhoe retells the encounter on the Fisher Farm and describes the "monster" revealed when one of the witnesses spotted their flashlight beam upon it near a tall Oak tree. The reader should note that this is LIGHT on "the subject." Misidentifications become more unlikely.

Keyhoe states, “The light fell squarely on a huge figure, at least nine feet tall, with a sweaty red face and protruding eyes about a foot apart." [...so, a BIG owl!] ..."As the light fell upon it, the monster's body glowed a dull green, then with an odd hissing sound it started toward them. Terrified, Mrs. May and the boys fled down the hill." Make note that they were NOT pursued, only repelled!

Keyhoe quickly learned of the Flatwoods incident by reading the numerous newspaper articles on the subject! It was world-class news in 1952! He would work to research and investigate this bizarre story, going forward, through his many contacts in Washington, D.C.! This is not to be sneered at. Keyhoe was WELL placed for substantive contacts.

He called the Pentagon and spoke to USAF public spokesman Albert Chop shortly after the incident occurred, and later during January of 1953 through November of 1953. During Donald Keyhoe's first telephone call to the Pentagon about the Flatwoods case, he did not take the case seriously! He stated, "I put it down to hysteria. As a joke I phoned Chop."

Keyhoe asked Chop, "How many Intelligence officers are you rushing down to Sutton?" Chop answered, "You too? he said sourly?" He continued, "We’re not even bothering to investigate. Several astronomers said a meteor went over there. [No, they didn't!] Those people must have dreamed up the rest." As the conversation continued, Keyhoe stated, "…But the Sutton [Flatwoods] story wasn't so easily downed. Radio commentators repeated it all over the country. A newspaper syndicate ran a series of articles." It was HOT!

Meanwhile, though, as we’ve written before, and behind the scenes, Intelligence Officials had quickly worked through the West Virginia State Police and got information about the incident from the Flatwoods locals. In town during the two days following the incident, officers planted a seed of doubt in the story with their negative remarks and even scoffed at the tale.

The thin blue line... of cover-up...

The police frankly ridiculed the witnesses and "debunked" the entire incident to the reporters covering the story, which made the story seem even more doubtful. Subsequently, the United Press picked up the negative story! Newspapers across the world reported, "State Police and a number of residents hooted at the reports as a product of hysteria" and added, "Police laughed. They said the so-called "monster" had grown from seven to 17 feet tall in 24 hours." This, reader, is the sound of a ufological can being kicked down the road...

Furthermore, it was reported that the damaged object flying over Flatwoods, "might have been a meteor crashing to Earth." …Well debunked, remember!

Ultimately?! The story was downplayed as a result of the negative information given to the press by the state police. Donald Keyhoe stated, "I discovered that the Air Force had not ignored the Sutton [Flatwoods] report. To avoid public attention, Intelligence had worked through the West Virginia state police, securing all the details." ...Nailing it down, in other words.

Feschino and Davis

Local resident Jack Davis gave researcher Frank Feschino, Jr. information about the state police during that time. In addition to securing details about the incident, the state police told Mr. Davis to keep quiet and not talk to anyone about the "Flatwoods Monster." He told Feschino, "They told me just not to discuss it with anyone." Jack said an officer lectured him, "That if you couldn't tell them what it was, then you don't tell them some phenomenon tale." Jack also stated, "I was in Sutton and a patrolman, by the name of Gumm talked to me a little bit. He expressed to me that any remarks or anything that people might ask about it [monster], not to give them any information and not to discuss it." Curious…

Keyhoe also adds additional information about another covert operation and states, "…Later from a source outside the Pentagon, I heard that Intelligence had followed this up by sending two men in civilian clothes who posed as magazine writers while interviewing witnesses." Keyhoe then explains, "Even if this was not true—and the Air Force denied it—their check through the state police showed more interest than they admitted!" 

Decades later, Mrs. May revealed to Feschino that two men from Washington, D.C. did visit her at home in Flatwoods while posing as newspaper reporters! They spoke to her on the day after the incident, investigated the encounter site on the farm, then came back the following day and questioned her again. This is a lot of attention for big owls and lingering meteors...

During their second visit, they had admitted who they were and asked Mrs. May if they could get a sample of the oil from her clothing that she'd described as splattered on her during her encounter with the "monster." She agreed.

After scraping all the oil residue from her clothing, the two men left Mrs. May's home, never to be seen again. Even though Keyhoe said the "Air Force denied this," his source back in 1952, who told him about the two undercover men, would seem to have been correct. 


Keyhoe then explains what occurred one week after the incident! He wrote, "…Then Mrs. May and the Lemon boy appeared on 'We the People' [TV show] and retold their frightening experience." The September 19, 1952 "WE The People" TV talk show featured interviews with the two witnesses and was broadcast live nationwide from New York City by NBC.

As a visual aid to be used during the episode, a large drawing of the "monster" was used during the interviews. An artist sat down with May and Lemon, the adult witnesses, before the show, interviewed them, and illustrated a quick drawing of the figure they’d described to him. The artist used their descriptions, as he took them, misleadingly, finished the illustration, and portrayed the figure as a scary-looking "space monster," wearing a skirt!

Feschino with the original drawing...

He’d illustrated a floating figure with a pointed cloth hood around its head! It was wearing a long, pleated dress and had long, skinny arms replete with lurid claws! When this drawing was shown to a live nationwide audience, the American public was flabbergasted at the sight of this "space monster" that had landed in West Virginia; the country was moved to near panic! Keyhoe thought so, at any rate.

As a result of the massive publicity this UFO incident was receiving, Keyhoe would write, "'This could get out of hand,' I told Chop. 'Why doesn't the Air Force squelch it?'" Chop answered, "'We've already said the object was a meteor,' he retorted." Said?!

Donald Keyhoe replied, "A lot of people don't believe it. And the way this has built up, it's bad." Of that conversation, Keyhoe also wrote, "'It'll die out,' Chop insisted." Keyhoe then responded to him, "…But people will remember it later, if something breaks." Chop then reiterated the Air Force's meteor explanation, "All those people saw was a meteor. They imagined the rest. We can't send Intelligence officers out on every crazy story." …But they would… and did… send a light battalion of very well supplied troops to the area about… something. More on that in a moment!

Keyhoe stated, "There was only one reasonable answer, and I should have seen it before. If the Air Force had sent investigators publicly in the hope of killing the story, it might have backfired. Papers and magazine writers would picture the Intelligence officers as making a serious investigation… It might seem proof to some people, that the Air Force was soberly impressed by the report—or at least that giants from space were considered a strong possibility."

Mr. Keyhoe started piecing the Flatwoods story together, then. He began to perceive a bigger if still imperceptible picture and was moved to take the case more seriously! He remarked, "When the time came to admit that the saucers were real, the slightest official hint of possible menace would be quickly remembered. From that angle the Sutton (Flatwoods) story was dangerous, with its picture of a fearsome creature intelligent enough to build and control spaceships. It was far better to brand the whole thing as a hallucination which Intelligence evidently believed was the answer." ...Far better? We wonder. ...And remember, we were shooting UFOs down, in the first place!

Flash forward to early 1993 when illustrator Frank Feschino, Jr. began to investigate the incident. He met and interviewed the primary adult witness, Mrs. May, about the so-called "monster." She explained that the "monster" drawing that the artist quickly drew and then was shown on the TV show in 1952 was incorrect!It didn't look like that, at all.” 

She said the figure was not covered in cloth; that it was "more metallic." That was the report from the beginning, after all! A "metallic" thing was described in the early news reports!

As she described it to Feschino in detail, he would sketch it himself, but forensically and not sensationally! The figure actually resembled a 12-foot-tall mini-spaceship or rocket; it seemed apparent.

Feschino's rendering did not look like the original drawing. Gone were the skinny arms and fearsome claws. Gone was the sweet sixteen skirt. Gone was the ridiculous and dismissable affect of a B-movie featured creature! The new figure looked like it had a relevant purpose lacking in the 1952 version, as it was not drawn for the sensational but for the record from THE primary witness!

The forensic unsensationalized rendering...

Feschino asked after the artist who drew it in 1952, "Why did he draw arms on it, because you told me it had antennae?” She answered, "I told him that too, but that's what he drew on it. To make it look more like a monster, I guess." The artist had “misinterpreted,” to be kind, the descriptions of the figure that May and Lemon had given him… and he had sensationalized the drawing to look like a "space monster" for TV! She also told Feschino, "I was close enough that it squirted oil out all over my uniform." She'd held the flash light! She knew what the damned thing looked like, boy howdy!

It was during this interview that Feschino began to realize anew! This figure that May and company encountered was actually some sort of craft or encounter suit … and not an existential "monster"… with arms and claws and wearing a skirt! That’s a key revelation foreshadowing the violent activity against UFOs surrounding this time period. It’s the “Summer of Saucers,” remember! Air War was a reality!

Leavitt on site in Flatwoods, 1952...

Later, in 1993, Feschino interviewed the 1952 commander of the West Virginia National Guard, Colonel Leavitt. This was the Commander of the military contingent detailed to the area, the reader will recall. Mr. Leavitt told him that he was contacted by Air Force officials in Washington on the night of the incident and was ordered to the Fisher Farm, as has been written.

Their mission was to cordon off the farm, examine the entire area and obtain specimen samples from the location of the encounter. He told Feschino, "They called me on the phone and asked me to get what they wanted, and I told them I would send it back to them. I did."

Later that evening, Colonel Leavitt went to the farm with about 50 troops. This was a split-off contingent from a larger force nearby performing another similar investigation. Near the encounter site of the Oak tree where the "monster” was sighted, Leavitt obtained soil, wood from the tree, leaf samples, and the unknown oily substance that was emitted by the "monster."

Leavitt told Feschino, "The Air Force, that's what they wanted me to do." He also said this about the Air Force, "They wanted to know what it was." In reference to the so-called "monster" seen near the Oak tree, Colonel Leavitt stated, "It just sat down. It just sat down under a limb. There was a limb, and it just scooted underneath it."

Feschino also inquired about the oil emitted by the "monster" near the tree at the encounter site. Colonel replied, "Where it sat, it had some oil coming out. Whatever it was." Feschino responded with levity, "I guess space ships have oil leaks too." Missing the humor, Leavitt responded seriously, "Maybe so."

Leavitt also told Feschino, "Well, there was something here that could fly backwards, or anywhere it wanted to go, just anywhere, as long as it didn't tear up its equipment." This statement reinforced Feschino's revelation that the "monster" was a mechanical craft or suit.

Feschino asked Leavitt how long his troops stayed on the farm after he left, "Now, how long was everybody up here?" Leavitt replied, "Well, they stayed the night." Feschino remarked, "…They did?!" Leavitt stated, "Yeah, to see if something else was going to happen..."

Colonel Leavitt collected the samples, departed the farm after 45-minutes or so, and repaired to another crash site alluded to, also in Braxton County. At the end of his interview, Colonel Leavitt told Feschino in a low, tremulous voice, "…Something was a cover-up."

Ms. May with the original rendering...

Back to the year 1952, but one week later, Mrs. May returned home from New York City after the TV show and discovered Flatwoods was plagued with reporters and hundreds of curious onlookers from all over the world! She was nonplussed. The town was overrun with even more visitors after her TV appearance! Thousands of the curious!

Throughout the week, Colonel Leavitt and National Guard soldiers were also visiting the farm for crowd control… and keeping an eye on the area. During that time, he also talked to Mrs. May and several of the juvenile witnesses, and he became aware of the details of the affair.

Mrs. May told Feschino of an incident that happened involving Leavitt after she arrived home from New York, "I hadn't been home too long until this truck came up and it had all the troops and everything on it, and Dale [Leavitt] came in. He asked me if he could borrow the picture [drawing] and he took it out and showed all the boys [troops]. After a while he came back in and said, 'Well, I want you to take a look at this' and he just turned it sideways and said, 'This is a complete missile.'" She added, "It was some kind of missile craft." Colonel Leavitt was well aware that the so-called "monster" was actually a machine and not a clawed "space monster."

Feschino additionally interviewed Mrs. May's son, witness Freddie, who had also illustrated a drawing of the "monster" during an interview the night of the incident. Freddie told Feschino, "It was mechanical; it was not alive. Maybe inside of the thing—there could have been something alive. What I saw was either a small spaceship or suit of some kind. Something it was wearing. It was mechanical."

...All the boys, and Lemon, drew the same character for a 
hard-nosed interrogator in separate interviews, 
immediately after the incident...

In reality, Feschino had discovered or rooted out that the "monster" was actually a metallic space suit topped with a pointed helmet that covered a red inner helmet! It was NOT a lurid faery tale by country feebs and moonshinin' hillbillies... as has been baselessly intimated by errant critics over the years! The lower torso flared out and was surrounded by metal pipes that were perhaps exhaust pipes and perhaps part of some kind of silent propulsion system that enabled it to hover and maneuver, with no report of loud sound that even a leaf blower must make... which it was doing… maneuvering... howsomever, silently. It was not a skirt!

Feschino also asked the Colonel, "Were there any other reports from Washington?" He answered, "No! They never—they never gave me anything back." The entire incident was being kept under wraps by Blue Book officials! Feschino didn’t get his hands on those files until the late 90s, or early 2K!

During Keyhoe's investigation, he was wholly unaware that the so-called "monster" was actually a machine resembling a small spaceship or craft. He was only aware of the incorrect, distorted, and far-fetched original TV drawing aired on "We The People."

Furthermore, the Air Force never gave Keyhoe any additional information about the case! They kept him in the dark on it. 

Later; however, Keyhoe did receive some additional compelling information from a pilot friend of his that he’d ran into in the snack bar at the Pentagon. This man was familiar with the Flatwoods case and was aware of a key point that Keyhoe was unaware of. Keyhoe writes that his name was, "Jim Riordan, a jet pilot I'd known for several years, along with his wife Shiela." Keyhoe stated, "(At Jim's request I have changed his last name, though none of the information he gave me was restricted in any way)." Keyhoe wrote that this jet jockey was retired and had fought in the Korean War! He’d received the "Distinguished Flying Cross and Silver Star ribbons." Riordan said he had stopped at the Pentagon "to see one of my old gang." 

As they spoke, Keyhoe said, "I showed him the ATIC reports. Riordan's brows went up. 'What's the deal?' he said suspiciously. 'After that book of yours, I thought you'd be poison to the Air Force.'

The two men spoke about his time in Korea, jet interceptions, and UFO cases. Shortly after, Riordan departed, but they had made arrangements to meet again. Subsequently, they DID meet again, kept in touch, continued to co-mingle, and also spoke on the phone discussing several puzzling UFO cases and current events. During one particular meeting with Riordan, he brought up the Flatwoods case.

Keyhoe writes, "'You know the Sutton monster story?' said Riordan. When I first heard of it - well, let that wait.

They continued to talk on other topics about planets and ETs before getting back to the Flatwoods case. Keyhoe then stated, "I started to ask him about the Sutton story. What was ATIC's conclusion?" He then informed Riordan, "They [ATIC] swear they didn't analyze it, but I'm positive they did check into it." In hindsight, how could they NOT look into it?! 

Keyhoe continued, "I told him what I knew about the case, and Riordan shook his head dubiously." Riordan replied, "It sounds as if there was something to it. Not a monster—I still can't see that—but it might have been a robot of some kind, the way they described it"!

Riordan states that he was well aware the figure seen in Flatwoods was, "Not a monster." He actually remarked, "it might have been a robot of some kind," which would indicate he believed it may have been a mechanical device or machine! This was a far cry from the silly clawed "monster" that was portrayed to the American public, which helped turn this event into a West Virginia folklore story. The Flatwoods story was CONTRIVED to be risible and therefore dismissible!

Regardless, Keyhoe was still puzzled with Blue Book's incomplete answers and conclusions about the incident, but stated, "When the time came to admit that the saucers were real, the slightest official hint of possible menace would be quickly remembered. From that angle, the Sutton (Flatwoods) story was dangerous, with its picture of a fearsome creature intelligent enough to build and control spaceships… It was far better to brand the whole thing as a hallucination… which Intelligence evidently believed was the answer." Again? …Far better? If we’d picked that can up instead of kickin' it down the road… again, this 78-year-old writer would have known nothing else and suspects that he would know something much better! That’s the intuition

In January of 1953, Donald Keyhoe called the Pentagon again and spoke to Albert Chop about the Flatwoods case. He explains the following information, "I was told what intelligence believed to be the basic facts. First, the glowing object seen by Mrs. May and the boys actually a meteor [debunked]: it merely appeared to be landing when it disappeared over the hill [debunked]. Second, the group did see two glowing eyes, probably those of a large owl perched on a limb[debunked]. Underbrush may have given the impression of a giant figure and in their excitement they imagined the rest [debunked]. Third, the boy's illness was brought on by their fright." What frightened him, one wonders…

Later that year Donald Keyhoe contacted Albert Chop at the Pentagon and spoke to him again. The following transpired, "'We're simply not bothering with monster stories,' Chop repeated, when I asked him again in November." Chop stated, "We've got enough trouble with confirmed sightings." So he said.

Keyhoe remarked, "Whether or not the Air Force analysis is correct; one point is certain—Intelligence carefully avoided a public investigation in order to prevent hysteria." Hysteria about what, then, the reader may wonder… …we do!

Captain Edward Ruppelt PBB Chief...
of "Lurid Duels of Death" fame...

In closing, Donald Keyhoe disclosed the following remark made to him by one Captain Edward Ruppelt, an interim Blue Book Chief! It appeared in his 1973 book, "Aliens from Space." Ruppelt informed Keyhoe that, "We're ordered to hide sightings when possible, but if a strong report does get out, we have to publish a fast explanation—make up something to kill the report in a hurry. We must also ridicule the witnesses, especially if we can't figure out a plausible answer." A prime example of this cover-up strategy, without a substantive doubt, was the "Flatwoods Monster" incident of 1952! Officialdom would do this again and again going forward...

So! …There it was in 1952 at Flatwoods (like it was in Roswell’s 1947!)! A full-blown air war this time, replete with everything necessary to qualify for an official acknowledgement and full disclosure of UFOs as an existential FACT, both those times… but we’d kick the ufological can down the road in our cowardice, again, JUST like we did in 1947!

Who is served? We offer that it is not lay humanity who is served! Served, rather, are the unelected, the irresponsible, …the few. That the lay humanity alluded to, those who are but the victims of the cowardice of these "few"… are not served, is increasingly apparent! It remains that this cowardiceinstitutional, philosophical, psychological, or otherwise… NEVER has an efficacious payoff.  No…Ignorant bliss is, and has ever been, a LIE! 

Our suspicion is that we will "Kick The Can," again...Read on!


"Shoot Them Down"!


 

Monday, June 01, 2026

The Callous' Fodder

.
.
.
Yeah, it's true... I'll see them 
in my early morning skies—
perceived because I'm looking 
...with a perspicacious eye.
.
Too... not indifferent to your scoffing
a trifle wounded by your scorn
remains that, yes, regardless, 
they're a truth that's being suborned.
.
See, we don't deal with them! 
We push them to the rear! 
We're cloaked with our "traditions," 
and we're frozen by our fear!
.  
Religiously, we're "counting beans," 
using science for excuses... 
all to disavow "conspiracies" 
acute with the abstrusest!
.
See, the stuff I've seen is present 
to any witness I might have. 
A friend, a'watch there with me... 
like the ones whom I have had? 
...But these are few and far between, 
these few who'd go along—
exploring outer darknesses 
after midnight's "sung her song..."
.
...To "BE" up... so damned early 
that the dogs are still asleep; 
to stumble in the kitchen 
and chance whackin' unshod feet? 
A lot to ask of one not blind 
to disbeliefs one has inside... 
These disbeliefs that one's force-fed 
to clutter up one's mind, it's said.
.
Yeah, we'd go out in the morning 
after, early, getting up, 
and we'd rise up with the lights off 
you know... so rhodopsin has a shot! 
We'd take some cups of coffee 
for the stuff that sharpens skies, 
and you'd watch with me, the UFOs, 
...we'd see with our own eyes!
.
It takes some "long-term" looking 
with the head well-tilted aft. 
People watch you looking 
and pretend it's YOU that's daft!
Though, that long-term look is useful...
It gives one time to think...
on how things fit together
as the cosmos nods and blinks...
It pains the neck a little bit, 
but try to persevere! 
It won't hurt for too much longer!
Then... you start to see them, clear...
.
...Lean up on a hitching rail! 
...I've a low retaining wall... 
It makes "the watching" easier 
as stars wink out or fall. 
...And sometimes skies are fervid 
with a movement of their own; 
the stars then "wondrous wanderers
sans a spot to call their home!
.
I've got some good binoculars, 
and rigged a steady stand; 
the images resolving 
are unmoved by shaky hands. 
They are clear beneath the star-field. 
I can zoom them in quite close. 
They ARE, not merely pelicans... 
...but for sure they won't be ghosts!
.
They're there like... stars set moving
They resolve as "orbs of light"; 
their movements are in magnitudes 
which vary, dark to bright.
They wink with strobe-like brightness 
in a random pattern dance. 
They'll glow like worms, unevenly... 
then out they'll blink, like chance!
They'll slow to almost stopping, 
then they'll speed up to a flash, 
increasing in intensity
or then "dimming out," abashed!
.
It's plain these things are out there 
so it's not that fight I seek... 
(fights about their *existence* 
are all specious, thin, and weak).
.
Though scan the implications! 
It's there one finds the nub... 
of graft which has corrupted us, 
so a few would have "enough."
.  
See, if UFOs infest the skies... 
the order would be NEW! 
It does, in fact, change everything
All outlooks change their view! 
That's still and all, a good thing 
with a future looming down... 
something unpredictable
a concrescence come to town!
.
Too, I'd bet on more autonomy 
as the value to be gained. 
"What's our profit in it,
Catbirds ask in sad refrain. 
See, their catbird seats are up for grabs 
because they've lesser value
Everyone'll be self-sustained
—self-reliant—so... revalued
That's my intuition
that's my optimism, friend, 
that "reach," indeed, exceeds its "grasp," 
or what's "heaven" there for, then?
.
See? They can't "co-opt" the aliens... 
or it would have come to pass
ET would be among us
begging food and hauling trash
...But UFO's are individual, 
they are personal—up close
They'd know the... "individual," 
and it's that approach they chose!
.
...But the "manor lord" won't have it, 
as his meter must be paid (!?!)—
inconvenient and contrary 
are the "beds" that he'd have "made"! 
So then, "reigns" are jerked too sharply 
by "tradition's" hands—which smell! 
These "rich" don't live like "people," see? 
...They've "contempt" that they'd still held!
.
...But, that's the problem neatly!
It's our culture on its rear. 
...And don't think we don't deserve that! 
We'd have earned it? Face THAT! Clear?
.
Too, values that were values "prior," 
before our new "concessions," 
might be found to be the agents 
of our cowardly intentions
Relieved, all bets are cancelled, 
and any "debt" just goes away
We'd find a brand new card game 
is the deal dealt that day!
.
Too, you can bet a *cosmic* card game 
with the deck all "strange" and "new." 
The "cards" will be peculiar... 
@nd th3y'll 83 num83r3d str@ng3ly, t00...
.
What's that left within us, then... 
when our future comes to pass... 
when we've made our fate's transition
and that future's here at last?
.
...Well, all that's left is love and... fate... 
cleaner power we'd all have... 
power more expansive—
a cosmic "kingdom" here at "hand"?  
This is only intuition; 
optimistic, I'd declare. 
...Comes vast "accelerations"; 
I'd contend "concrescence" glares!
.
The sooner we all cop to this... 
the better off we'll be... 
as there's so "much more to 'heaven'
than a "top-class" has, you see?
.
That there's that clear autonomy 
to be found at "zero points." 
That there's, in fact, a "free lunch," 
and that's "hemp," not "smoking joints." 
That there's respect which we don't have 
when we're the brunt despised... 
and mere fodder for the callous few... 
and their psychopathic lies.


lehmberg2002@gmail.com


Look up and out and in with courage because
the sky is telling truth about your culture
that your culture is too frightened—and too invested—to let you see!

.

Terence McKenna observed that culture is not the individual's friend. Step outside its bounded box to have this demonstrated. Our "Callous" culture, remembering, then, that culture is not your friend, promotes a conformity that marginalizes and homogenizes a population from creative new ideas, good or bad. The history would seem to say that this is not an efficacious endeavor or pursuit. 

No... we're much better off and much better served by a vast marketplace of unruly, conflicting, and divergent... ideas. Conformity is a cloying death, subtle and suffocating. That's the history. That's what all the great literature has said... We'll digress a bit to observe, too, that the more equitably a society treats its Women, the more efficaciously successful that society will be. That's history, too.

Back at the "human potentiality ranch," it's similar to the fact of biological reproduction issued forth from the larger gene pool! More diversity equals more potential for success and failure... still, more "stuff" to try. More not being less, in this case. Try more "stuff" to have more stuff... work.

More ideas means more thinking can be done out of the box, thinking done of needs. Thinking out of the box leads historically, almost invariably, to some kind of useful elevation or progression for the species.

We would be as the gods... and why not? Weren't we struck stupid at Babylon by a collection of jealous gods for similar aspirations? ...Means it's possible, eh?

We could be as the gods... ...though, do we risk another Babalonian spanking? If so, I'd say God's pretty chicken-shit, all respect to God. Why burden us with aspirations forever disallowed? Is that part of the abuse? Is that what heaven's for?

I would aspire to "new things done in an unpredictable way." You, reader? It's how we can push back... even on entropy!

There are rewards to thinking outside the box... even precluding unfortunate consequences, I'm betting.  All our insights and high flying accomplishments come from confident leaps of justified conviction (read: a testing of faith! Untested faith seems valueless!).

There are punishments, too, sure. Today, people are still persecuted for ideas that they have, and they are further pilloried for the lawful expressions of those ideas. Here is your real blasphemy!

The irony is that there can be such egregiously shortsighted enmity in a nation that would otherwise (and so stridently!) pride itself on its appreciation of free expression... that there could be, then, such a gleeful suppression of same! If not gleeful, then arbitrary. If not arbitrary, then unethical. If not unethical, then just plain wrong, wrong-minded, or wrongly motivated eh? Such is likely so.

Not too long ago, less than a hundred years, we lived in an era of a current Republican's dream... it was a reality of unbridled and unregulated capitalism. It was an era without unions, workers' rights, social security, product safety, or individual justice. It was hell on earth for the garden variety human being, illustrating culture's unfriendliness; "Everyman" lived, injuriously, under the perpetual sword of an overly harsh social Damocles, even in our nation of nations... why, especially in our nation of nations!

The moment we began to allow (even grudgingly) for the free expression of ideas (and embrace an efficacious humanism!) is the moment when we begin our aspirations into a 21st Century of productive individual self-determination and self-actualization! 

Not scientism! Sociology! Secular humanism open-minded and self-aware, if dwindled presently, rather using our compelling Cartesianism like a tool for the betterment of "Everyman," not just the stockholders. See, it's the vast majority who can't afford "stock" given the chicanery of the corporations issuing their duplicitous and disingenuous "instruments" of difficult-to-depend-upon... bupkis!

That's what Walt Disney preached in the 50's. Anything was getting ready to happen! It did, too. New things executed themselves in unpredictable ways! Consider the personal computer!

Look at the advancements of the last fifty years and thank a barely tolerated cornucopia of secular renaissance ideas. The suppression of any idea in this context is illogical and corrosively contrary to that continued rise. I suspect that this assertion must be universally accepted. Death seems the only alternative. To whom are the "dark ages" laid but to the backstepping proclivities of the sectarian and violently non-secular.

...And sure!!! There will be bad ideas!!! Remains, that's beside the point! "Bad ideas" will fail because they ARE bad!!! Consider Trump's neo-fascism! It WILL fail. It's a bad idea! 

In the historic bible, God(s) whacked us at Babylon, as was mentioned, for demonstrating the potentiality to be as *they* were, that was their fear... not one wholly omnipotent God, mind you, but many, shall we say genetically superior and enlightened BEINGS—or just from where did genes with no clear analogs in other species... come from... NOT accounted for in our genetic record? Duplication, mutation, de novo gene birth? Maybe... but we don't know what we don't know.

Should we keep faith with a God who whacks us for thinking outside his box? Sounds like the aforementioned abuse to me. Additionally, have you noticed how much less respect each individual person has to be paid as the population goes, steadily and invariably, up—while our religious leaders say, and do, nothing? ...And I mean no thing but that which facilitates themselves or their scurvy priorities.

Ideas... Like... Gylany! Gylany! Learn it! Know it! Live it! Love it!

Somebody knows.

Restore Ford... Read on!

Thursday, May 14, 2026

Letters...

.
.
.
What seems plain as virgin day? 
Our Agencies in disarray! 
Remember, it's some glad elite, 
said circumspect—and très discrete—
who keeps real knowledge from us all 
with clever dodges, tricks, and stalls
Facts and figures are distorted
"covered up"; it's well reported!
.
...Like, UFOs they've hidden, friend, 
so we shan't know what these portend!  
Nameless lights are highly strange and... 
are they there to "rearrange
those "feelings" that we have for "leaders" 
we'd "elected"—some dull mouth breathers! 
.
They don't work for us, you know? 
These letters, though we front their dough! 
...Too, they're but tools of corporate masters
and what's good for them spells our disaster?
.
Their beginnings are just fraught with "stain." 
Hoover was a monster, plain
A wolf, and in his own employ, 
he lived a life that few'd enjoy...
.
See, he kept these "records," massive files, 
and these were used to keep defiled... 
men who might have been courageous! 
...Glad psychopathy is outrageous
...Streets and buildings named for him... 
hide God knows what... contained within!
.
The FBI's just what we know, 
but other letters hide! Hello
Projects black as pitch or jet 
are busy with a work that's... "wet..."
.
We're informed it's "for your safety," 
but that's a road not traveled safely! 
Much that happens this way now... 
if we but knew (?!)... we'd disallow
People suffer, families fall, 
and unknown "secrets" make us crawl, 
dancing to the tune of those... 
who keep those secrets, don't you know
We shan't have control of these. 
Our *letters* keep us on our knees!
.
The CIA and ATF
are programs tacking right, not left. 
We don't know what they have done. 
We can't guess what tales are spun! 
We don't see their covert purpose. 
An "oversight" shall not alert us!
.
Fed manure, plain and stark, 
we're just mushrooms in the dark! 
...Only here to pay the bill 
for services they don't fulfill!  
Kept in chains they've manufactured, 
we're depressed and broken—fractured! 
We're neutered, and then kept dependent,
while some maintain their GRAND resplendence!
.
It's all about autonomy, 
and how they covet it, you see? 
Aliens—just the craft they fly
show cleaner ways to do things, Clyde!
.
We might stop with "fossil fuels," 
and package food with stuff "reused." 
This information—perhaps obtained—
contributes to our freedom's gain!  
We shouldn't want to cheat and steal; 
folks deserve a better deal. 
...But some would have us "on their meter" 
(but hide it so the theft is sweeter!
paying taxes that provide... 
the "corporate welfare" we decry!
.
We're not kept abreast of things! 
Why? It complicates the joy of "kings"! 
These are kings too arbitrary
rule of law's, to them, contrary
They now infest our institutions
make the rules and constitutions
but use these as their mechanisms... 
puppets for their canted schisms!
.
To buttress their autonomy, 
they'll treat you like an enemy
using *letters* like a club, 
so's to obfuscate the issues snubbed!
.
Anything can hide in there, 
where *letters* work; expect despair. 
A people's interests have no hope 
if they are but the "chosen's" joke.
.
NASA is a strange pretender! 
The CIA? A black contender! 
The FBI we've just considered, 
so cogitate, we're not delivered
Don't forget the NSA 
as you can bet they've feet of clay! 
These have kept us in the dark, 
they're *letters* aping eel and shark
All our armies have their "shops"; 
all have their share of black ops-nauts!
.
The OSI and GAO 
play cards precluding what we'd know. 
The SAT and ICI 
just muddy water—cloud your sky. 
The SBI and OSS, well, we can't know... 
...It's your best guess!  
We're beholden, on a clock
working—sweating—common stock.  
On a treadmill, in a wheel
while these preclude some real deal!

lehmberg2002@gmail.com
www.AlienView.net





Now let’s step out of the cadence and into the record...

Created specifically in 1952, the NSA was an agency approved and justified only to accomplish the following: it was to house and consolidate all the other agencies, bureaus, and intelligence shops efficaciously and efficiently! It was conceived to facilitate oversight, engender accountability, and save money... even to protect the garden-variety American from the military-industrial complex that Eisenhower passionately, if futilely, warned us against!

This new "umbrella" agency was created... but not a single other agency was effectively incorporated! Only the most servile competition was engendered for money and status... "constructive cooperation" was essentially DEAD!

In fact, the number of lettered agencies only increased, and so BLACK, they didn't even have letters! We're reminded that just the day before the Towers came down in New York (odd timing, that!), Donald Rumsfeld, then the Secretary of Defense, very casually reported on television that the Defense Department could not account for 2.1 trillion dollars that had been allotted to it by Congress... 2.1 trillion dollars?! ...Then the towers came down. 2.1 trillion dollars kinda fell out of the news as Bush's approval rating went over 90 percent... for a while...but it was a long time before sanity prevailed... blazes... we're not over it yet, risking a digression!

So... and additionally, there is inadequate... no, I'm sorry, I mean... NO oversight, and there is more money spent now than there ever was—sinister augmentations of this proclivity to waste by an unknown but certainly considerable factor...

Regarding the FBI, well, it's always written a check its ass couldn't cash, and it has improved little since its first director used it to make himself an arbitrary king in this land where there are not supposed to be ANY kings... by LAW. Nobody misses Herbert Hoover. No one will miss Kash Patel...

...God, but what must hide in some of those black vaults!

Somebody knows. The disarray the reader saw at the start is the same disarray that swallowed John Ford.

Restore John Ford! Read on.





Grok In Fullness

An "Owl," a Meteor, and a "Coward’s" Media

  Donald Keyhoe An "Owl," a "Meteor,"  and a "Coward’s" Media... by Alfred Lehmberg [ Frank Feschino, Jr. ex...

WHAT'CHA READIN'!