Justification

Critical Prose & Poetic Commentary regarding UFOs and their astonishing ancillaries, consciousness & conspiracy, plus a proud sufferer of orthorexia nervosa since 2005!

Saturday, February 13, 2016

10 Reasons Why Homosexual “Marriage” is Harmful...



10 Reasons Why Homosexual “Marriage” is Harmful so Must be Opposed... ...and ten reasoning rebuttals to same!


1. It Is Not Marriage!!!

That sounds like an opinion.  Not a considered, learned, or supported one, but one that cherry picks debated scripture to support personal feelings and attitudes based on conjectures as fallacious as they are unsupported and as mean spirited as they are hateful.  Opinions can ape an anal pore!


2. It Violates Natural Law!!!

Not at all. Actually, it validates it.  It is the expression of a biological imperative coded into hardwires of genetic existentiality, and it is every bit as valid as the imperative to eat or have ANY kind of sex between consenting adults and seen, moreover, everywhere else in the biological world from fruit flies to Rick Santorum.


3. It Always Denies a Child Either a Father or a Mother!!!

No! It encourages both, and!  Forgetting the uninformed, ignorant, abusive, and even toxic living conditions that too many children find in the associations of heterosexuals, studies of gay parents indicate that their "children," (many times ones that heteros didn't want) are more well adjusted than their hetero peers perhaps because they're more driven to better parentage... perhaps because it's so much easier to have their children taken away.


4. It Validates and Promotes the Homosexual Lifestyle!!!

Forgetting for a moment that gay people come from these same straight people, what could be wrong about the acceptance of biological imperative alluded to above as wholly pragmatic, the end of baseless hatred and  one-sided violence, and any reduction to toxic bigotries only the province of suspect religious tight-asses, the gay self-loathing, and mouth breathing nose-bubblers... but I repeat myself.


5. It Turns a Moral Wrong into a Civil Right!!!

No.  It defines the very soul and spirit of a civil right.  One has a RIGHT to avail themselves of the liberty to love whom they will, engage in a union of lawful activities between consenting adult persons, and have that union respected in a progressive state and society.  Anything else is unconstitutional tyranny and pointed out, so far, by the Supreme Courts of many states.


6. It Does Not Create a Family but a Naturally Sterile Union!!!

A facile non-point... As pointed out above gay families can be superior in the aggregate, do everything a non-gay family does, and this is forgetting that a union is a union, is a union, and will _remain_ a union without regard to the inability to produce children (produce issue)... except for the ones abandoned by hetero parent as outlined above.  One presumes that hetero but sterile couples should be similarly castigated!

7. It Defeats the State’s Purpose of Benefiting Marriage!!!

What a steaming pile of presumptive  zero sum argle-bargle.  The purpose of a state is to be kept free of religious proclivities because those proclivities are based on a very suspect and untested faith, a faith that most are not comfortable sharing because that faith is not scientific, logical, likely, or sensibly supported.  On the contrary, it is many times hypocritical and entirely risible where it is patently authoritarian and unjustly unilateral.  We need MORE marriage and less discrimination of same.

8. It Imposes Its Acceptance on All Society!!!

No... see, that is just so way out of line!  That's what the odious critics of homosexuality do!  These claim a moral high ground and demand to be the state and society's default arbiter.  These DEMAND that it's their  imprimatur that is impressed on society.  Gays just want to exist without fear, social or physical.  You'd have them deny their own existence as a matter of social course or endure that fear.  Gays impose nothing.  Sexual bigots impose on the homosexual's very existence!  

9. It Is the Cutting Edge of the Sexual Revolution!!!

You say that like it's a bad thing.  It remains that contraceptives and real information regarding sexual matters would put a torpedo WELL below the waterline of overpopulation, unwanted pregnancies, sexually transmitted disease, and ABORTION ironically enough.  Sexual bigots are AGAINST contraception and the science of information.  A reasonable person might conclude that these sexual bigots decrying homosexuality are FOR overpopulation, FOR unwanted pregnancies, FOR sexually transmitted disease, and FOR ABORTION! 


10. It Offends God!!!

Not my God!  My God celebrates the courage of the gay man or woman to BE the persons SHE MADE THEM TO BE!  No... it's not gays who are the problem here.  It is the person thoughtlessly opposed and willing to inculcate ignorant, diseased, and unnatural social mores as correct behavior sanctioned and sanctified... but without a capacity to understand their ignorance, aptitude to accept a colorful humanity, ability to incorporate new information, or skill to recognize their hypocrisy!  I resent, reject and revile these moronic and insentient sexual bigots!

The evil some perceive is but their own reflection in a cracked mirror of their own revolting and ironically self-loathing narcissism.  These should step off, away, and down where appropriate. Posted.



█.Æ£.█

2 comments:

Emma said...

Wow, what a reminder of how bigoted some people still are in this day and age! There is still a long way to go.

Alfred Lehmberg said...

I'm presumed to be gay one would presume. Since gay is biological fact and cannot provide the slightest offence in the same manner as "straight" is incapable of providing a similar offence, why would I need to confirm _or_ deny?

Grok In Fullness

Errol

Errol Bruce-Knapp, of UFO UpDates, Strange Days — Indeed, the Virtually Strange Network... ...and the coiner of the expression ...